While I was reading the article, I found myself growing very angry. I realized, once I was done reading, that I was not frustrated with Rich Lowry for giving the speech but with the people of which he was talking. Being poor is not always something that can be controlled, however, there are times when poverty can be avoided.
While reading the article again I had a flashback of the seminar we had today in class. I went over the parts when we were discussing how a college education can increase the likeness of a good job after getting a college degree. I also recalled though, that one doesn't need an education to go far in life if they simply try their hardest and are open to learning and bettering themselves.
I found the article very realistic. Many people are becoming pregnant out of wedlock. Even someone does not have children, they do not work to their full potential meaning they are not doing their best work. If they would try harder and do their best, they would be more likely to become noticed and be offered a promotion, therefore increasing their income.
Americans are becoming less and less willing to do the work that their parents did before them. They realize that they can receive unemployment or just get by with doing the bare minimum. This is the problem. If Americans actually put forth 100% of effort into whatever they were doing, the poverty level would drop and this county would become a much better place. Rich Lowry said it best "they don’t make it harder for anyone else to get ahead." It's up to each and every one of us to change the world. I will leave you with a saying of inspiration: be the change you wish to see in the world.
Jess, I loved your blog. It related to a lot that was talked about in both the article and in out discussions. This morning I was talking with Ann and Natalie, and we remarked on the current rivalry between countries, in which America is falling behind. My mother told me recently about the type of schooling in Japan, and it sounded dreadful to me, focusing their entire lives on nothing but schoolwork. But maybe America needs more of that. Kids need to stop being fed the idea that sports are more important than education, when their education is what will take them farther in life. I got a little longwinded there, but your blog sparked some ideas. Keep up the good work!
Jess, you did a great job on this blog. I especially liked your last comment. You and I definitely have coinciding opinions about this issue. I agree that our generation needs to realize that our work ethic is nowhere near that of our ancestors, and we jus work to improve. Great job!
Jessica, I agree with a lot of your blog! I enjoyed your opening and second paragraph because I too think that much of poverty could be avoided depending on the different people and their situation. Good work!
For ages, America has been known as the land of opportunities. People from all over the world immigrate to America for the chance to make a living, to thrive in a world of their making. America has become a culturally diverse country where hard work can take you anywhere. It is a country that revolves around the idea of capitalism; business is lead by individuals or companies instead of the government. As such, individuals need to work hard if they want to succeed, yet some people do not seem to understand this.
"The Great Equalizers" by Rich Lowry was filled with different thoughts and ideas, but it centers around the belief, or disbelief in his case, that the inequality crisis in America is due to the rich. Frankly, I find the thought insulting and completely agree with Lowry. I don't really think of my family as being rich, but we are pretty well off. That is because my parents studied hard in school and continue to work hard daily. They have difficult jobs that required a proper education, and so they have reaped what they sowed. I do not think that these luxuries that they enjoy are in anyway unfair, though maybe I am slightly biased as someone who benefits from their toils.
In a more personal way I find it undermining. Recently I listened in on a conversation my mom had with my stepdad. They discussed how taxes for those who a higher income are higher than those with a lower income, and the reason why they find it unfair. They work hard, put in extra time, and do their jobs. They are rewarded for their above-average work with the loss of their hard-earned money. If your going to end up losing so much money, why not do any easier job in the first place? Maybe that is not the right way to view it, but it is discouraging. Why should I struggle if it will not make my life any better? That is the message I feel I have been sent.
This same message has been sent to the rest of our generation, but a time will come when we see the results. Will our generation fall apart and lose all motivation to excel? Or will we toss these preconceived notions aside and live our lives to the fullest? Only time will tell, as the saying goes. I believe that young adults will not be influenced by this. Certainly a few will, but there will always be those who simply breeze through life doing nothing more than the bare-minimum. And maybe I speak more of myself than the generation as a whole, but I think that we are a pretty competitive bunch, whether with others or simply ourselves. We will continue to learn and to moil throughout our lives, despite the income that we make.
Meaghan, your last paragraph summed up your blog very nicely. I have to agree that there will always be those who simply breeze through life only doing what they absolutely have to, which when you really think about it, is quite sad. Around St. Marys, people are just very competitive. Everyone tries their hardest because they want to reach their goal whether it's winning a game, medal, or just doing something they've never done before. Going into your blog more, I think that as much as it is the individual's responsibility to have the motivation and drive to excel in life, the parents and generation above that person need to be encouraging and willing to teach the skills that are needed. Looks like I got long winded too. Good blog Megs!
The article "The Great Equalizers", written by Rich Lowry was one that I found kind of startling. As I was reading the article, I found that I felt bad for the poverish people they were referring too.
For one thing, they can't always control that they are living pay check to pay check. When the article stated, "if all Americans finished high school, worked full time at whatever job they then qualified for with their education, and married at the same rate as Americans had married in 1970, the poverty rate would be cut by around 70 percent," this made me quite angry. This statement was unsettling to me mostly because most of the time, it is not there choice to not finish high school or marry someone. I am sure if you asked any of those people they would definitely want to finish their high school and/or college career if they had the opportunity to.
The article also seemed to imply that the high amount of poverty isn't caused by the overwhelming amount of people on the other end of things. However, I think it does. As one can see, there is an imbalance between the low, middle, and high class of people. There needs to be more of a balance, because I think that would cut down on the amount of poverty overall.
As far as my family goes, I am not sure exactly where we stand in the midst of this. But, I do know that both of my parents have good, solid jobs. We also have a nice house, food in the fridge, new clothes on our backs, and my brothers and I receive a quality Catholic education. I know I can't complain.
Tori, while I agree that a better balance would be good for our economy, I disagree that it isn't a person's choice to finish their degree or get married when they have a child out of wedlock. Any person can get a GED and many people who don't finish were expelled or dropped out. And while they might express a wish to have gotten a higher education, the real question is, would they if given the chance? You did a great job on this blog Tori, and it was nice to hear your opinion although we disagree.
Tori, I really like how you approached the issue of poverty from a different angle. I never thought about it as being imbalanced, but now that I read what you wrote, I could not agree more. I really enjoy how you talked about your family and how even though you don't know where you stand in the characteristics of poverty, you don't plan on letting that stop you from doing your best with everything you do. Good job!
Tori, it was interesting to read your blog. We have very different opinions, so I was curious to see where your blog would go. While I did not agree with what you said, you made very valid points. Good work!
Tori, I agree with Meaghan. I did not completely agree with everything you said about the poverty people, but I enjoyed your blog. Poverty is such a difficult topic to discuss and I thought you stated your opinions very well. Good job!
Tori, I feel very similar to the way you described in your last sentence. I also like how you used quotes and good descriptions in your blog. Well done!
When I read the article “The Great Equalizer”, I thought that some of the points Rich Lowry made were rather intriguing. He stated that rich people have absolutely nothing to do with the “inequality crisis”. No I don’t know that I totally agree with that statement, but I don’t totally disagree with it either. There are times when poverty seems unavoidable. Many poor people state that they don’t really have an option. In some situations this is true, but in others poverty is rather simple to avoid.
Most people who are rich took a chance during their lifetime. They did something that was risky, but if it paid off they would be in a great situation financially. This chance could have been taken by anyone, whether they are poor, middle class, or rich. People may not all have the same opportunities, but everyone has opportunities in life to make something out of themselves. It is the people who truly want to go somewhere in life that take advantage of those opportunities. I don’t think that I blame the “inequality crisis” on a certain group of people. Each group of people could probably be doing something more than they are now.
It would be beneficial for the country if they figured out a way to balance the situation between the poor, middle class, and rich. This is a great example why a good education is necessary. If a person receives a good education and uses it the correct way, they will be doing well. Dr. Ben Carson grew up in a rough situation. His family did not have much money at all, but he received an education. He then went to college, and he only had more success from that point on.
I definitely would not call my family rich or poor. We are right in the middle. I can’t complain at all about my living situation. I receive an education at a Catholic school, and I live in a nice house. I know that these things and many more activities that I take part in are mostly because my parents are able to bring in a good income. This is because they both work hard and long hours each week. It is essential that if a person wants to be successful in the world today they must work hard.
Drew, what really hit me from your blog was how you didn't fully blame either side, meaning the rich or the poor, you simply offered solutions to the problem instead of picking a side. I found that rather interesting and think that it was a very unique angle to approach from. Excellent work!
Drew, I too believe that the government should try and find a solution on how to create a balance between the poor, middle, and rich class. Also, I think it was important that you brought up that the most successful and/or wealthy people took a chance during their life. You will never know if you can be successful unless you risk it and try. Great Job!
I neither agree nor disagree with the opinion that Rich Lowry expressed on poverty in his article 'The Great Equalizers.' But how could I be expected to when he wrote about such a controversial topic? A lot of people are trying to play the blame game with poverty; who's at fault for the increase? I think that Rich Lowry makes his opinion obvious in his final line, "In other words, they don’t cut anyone off from the foundations of success that are the country’s great equalizers." The 'they' that he refers to are the people who are financial stable, and what he's saying is that they are not responsible for others failure. But is that true?
I see poverty as being no different than any other topic, there are two sides to the story. In some cases, I agree with Lowry because the people who end up without money brought it upon themselves. On the other hand, when someone is laid off and they are unable to find a job, can they help it? It's the same way with everything. I don't make a solid opinion because I understand that each situation is different.
Rich Lowry's article was harsh, but I found it likable. Even though I didn't agree with everything he said, his honest and straight-forward opinion is refreshing. People beat around the bush to much these days (excuse the cliche.) He also backed himself up with impressive statistic and a sort of rude pathos where he called out the people who were just making bad choices and being lazy. It was persuasive, but I still don't think that anyone is responsible for poverty.
Ann, your approach to this blog was unique, and I enjoyed reading it. I thought it was nice that you gave an honest opinion about not being able to give a solid opinion. Great job!
Ann, I agree with your point of view, each situation is unique and you can't make assumptions about people's lives. Poverty is a topic that can have many different sides and you can't have one inclusive opinion on it. Good job
"The Great Equalizers" by Rich Lowry made me quite angry. I disagree with a lot of what he had to say, but I do see where he is coming from.
I believe that the rich do have a lot of control over the jobs and education of poor people, but not all of it. Who hires, or mostly doesn't hire, these people in poverty? That's right, the middle or high classes. Without a job, how can they be able to afford an education beyond high school? If college courses weren't so expensive, this might not be as big of a problem. I also believe that the many low class people are stereotyped into their lifestyles. Yes, they should be trying to prove those stereotypes wrong, but that can be difficult when the people around them don't have faith in them. The people who are stuck in poverty have the power to change the way they are living. They can go out and apply for job after job until one of them is the right one for them. It's a controversial topic, but I think that poverty is the result of a lack of unity and openness in this country.
I would consider my family middle class. My parents make a living that keeps a roof over our heads and food on the table, and that's enough for me. For this generation, I truly think anything is possible. I've been surprised with the accomplishments the people around have made. Their hard work and dedication makes it easier to have faith.
I believe that anyone, no matter their race, religion, education level, or financial standards, can accomplish anything. If you want to be a neurosurgeon like Ben Carson, then work hard, put forth all of your effort, believe in yourself. I don't think your social class should determine your abilities in life, but, in most cases, they do. Education is important, but it's not everything. I think the most important thing in life is how you perceive yourself and go about the options you make for yourself.
Natalie, I really like the way that you thought about both sides of the poverty controversy. They may not have too many options, but it is crucial that they try to prove other people wrong who stereotype them. Life is not fair! You did a great job at relating the topic to Ben Carson. Anyone can accomplish anything in life if they put in the hard work and dedication. Good effort!
Natalie, your view is interesting. I agree with you that people should be able to change their circumstance and many try, some succeed and others don't. It is up to the middle and higher classes to give them opportunities to through jobs but it is up to them to perform well to keep their jobs. Overall, nice job.
Natalie, I like your strong view on this situation, but there are a few things I would disagree with. I would agree that middle or higher classes do most of the hiring but I do not think it gives them control over who is poor and who is not. Those hiring have one job, hire the most qualified, capable applicant. I do no think they are worried about who is poor or who is rich. If they were then they would be discriminating against others, thus not doing their job correctly. I would also like to argue that an education beyond high school is not impossible for the impoverished. If you are smart and you get all the right scores and all the right grades, you will be noticed. Someone is going to help you get into college. There are also scholarships that people can earn so they do not have to fully pay the steep college prices. I guess the bottom line is if you are smart you are going to be noticed for your actions. I would further argue that those with a high school degree can still be successful. My dad never went on to college, but he owned PA Body and Frame for over twenty years. I am also sure that there are more people who went on to be successful with only a high school degree.
I highly respect your stance and opinion on the matter, I just differ my thinking a little bit.
Poverty in America has become a huge issue. Our country is slowly losing the work ethic it began with and allowing for the government to provide enough assistance for a family to live on without working. Before I am contradicted for stereotyping, allow me to say, not all of the poor are like this. Many have good work ethics and simply struggle to find a good steady job or encounter other difficulties that are uncontrollable. These are not the people I speak of. The article "The Great Equalizers" does a good job characterizing them. Single parents who refuse to marry the father or mother of their child, people who do not graduate from high school, and those who don't work more than sixteen hours a week are the ones I speak of.
It's come to the point where people need to accept their station in life. I don't mean that if there is a possibility to improve, it shouldn't be taken. Our county needs workers who are willing to do menial labor. But, many people now believe that no matter their station in life, they shouldn't have to do that kind of work. They won't accept that someone needs to do this work, and that someone might be them. Without a high school degree, there are very few jobs that can be found that aren't menial labor. And, as the article stated, employers are looking for reliable, honest, and hard-working individuals. Without these characteristics, or lacking the drive to develop them, many of the impoverished are unable to hold good jobs because of their poor character.
My father is an extraordinary man. He completed his high school degree, but never continued his education to care for his mother. He began working when he was 14, and never stopped. He took whatever work he could, starting at a factory and was one of their best workers for the many years he worked there. He might not have liked it, but he knew he had to do it. He eventually went to work at the sewage plant where he has been promoted to the second highest position available. Despite his lack of a formal education, he opened his own small mechanic garage from his house. He worked on people's cars, fixing, painting, and even being commissioned to build cars from scrap. He is the deputy chief of the local fire department and an EMT, and somehow found time to rebuild our house. He has done so much, and yet could have easily have turned out to be poor instead of bringing himself and our family to the middle class. The one thing that determined this was his work ethic. He never stops and is so passionate about everything he does. He worked a full year with a herniation in his spine that should have greatly limited his mobility.
I will never believe that a person cannot change their own lives and station in life. If a person is determined and willing to take some risks, they can always continually improve although it might be slow going. Tenacity is something that has begun to fade in our country. Our generation is losing that will to fight to achieve something. I also partly blame the media and what it teaches now. Instead of dreading teen pregnancy, TV has begun to glorify it which causes girls to believe that they will be fine if that happens. But, the girls shown are being paid money that they can use to support themselves, while most other girls will have to be with their child and work a full time job to get by. That job, since they became impregnated in high school and probably just got a GED, will most likely not be a glamorous one.
Poverty is not caused because the rich are taking opportunities away from the poor. It's because the poor won't go find jobs and then strive to keep them. America needs to start encouraging better work ethics. More investigation should determine how much financial aid should be given to people, and should be lessened if possible. Poverty is a hard thing to fight, but it's time America went about it the right way.
Hannah, when you talk about the things your father did without a high education it was very astonishing to me. Most of the people in my family had to go to college before they could begin their jobs. It was very interesting and helpful to read your take on education. Really goos work!
Han, I really loved how you used your dad as an example of how hard work can get you very far in life. I completely agree that if someone wants to change their situation that can. You had very powerful points, Great Job!!
Hannah, I think it is quite a success story when you talk about all that you father has accomplished. He reminds me of Ben Carson when you stated how me might now have liked that particular job, but he made the best of it and was the best worker the company had. Ben Carson always made sure whatever job he had that he was the very best at it.
However, I do feel in today's society, a high school and college education is needed to go somewhere. It is unfortunate that kids today cannot make a life out of what your father did.
The article, "The Great Equalizers", by Rich Lowry was very interesting as it discussed the poverty issue. The statistics and facts about the topics of marriage, working, children, and education were quite fascinating. I personally agreed with some thing Rich Lowry said and disagreed with others, but I still felt it was a very good article,
The first topic was marriage and children. I do agree that having two parents makes a family stronger and decreases the chance for poverty. The family has two people employed or working with the house rather than one. However, sometimes situations occur where there isn't a father or mother involved, and I do not think that those people should be blamed and criticized for their poverty. I am blessed with two working and educated parents, but sometimes it is not that simple.
The next main issue is that of education. The number of dropouts is increasing and it is scary sometimes. My brother's friend just dropped out of college and it was sad to hear but real. The percentages given by Rich Lowry are crazy. This generation has so many people that seem to be just giving up on their education either in high school or college. It is a stressful life, but I think the students need to be pushed harder and realize how important having an education can be. Not only for the job sake, but also for the pride and dignity.
Jobs however are also very important. So many people are not striving for a good job. I do think more adults should be pressured to work more full time jobs, but I also feel that sometimes it is difficult. Yes, no job means no income. This is a major reason for poverty within families. My family stresses the importance of having a successful job. Both of my parents are successfully working. I am truly thankful for all my parents do to put a roof over my head and food on the table.
All in all, I do not disagree with most of what Rich Lowry had to say. I think he stresses the importances of what the people are doing that is causing such an increase in poverty. If people would work harder and strive to be the best they can, poverty would not be as much of an issue that it is.
Jolene, I like how you explain that when a father or mother is not involved in a marriage anymore, the other people in the family should not be criticized. I also enjoy how you talk about how critical it is to find a good job in the world today. It is rather challenging to be successful without a good career that you enjoy. Great work!
"The Great Equalizer" made some statements that I found very true. I discovered myself really believing in what was said. Not that every time someone is below the poverty level it is their fault, but more often than not I believe that it is the person under the person who is poor's fault. At some point some one in the person's family had to make a mistake to be under the poverty level. I also believe that people can get stuck under the poverty level. When parents make mistakes like not being educated or having children out of wedlock it creates circumstances that are extremely difficult to get out of. Many people have to overcome odds because they start out in poor conditions to start their lives but do make it out.
I believe that taking risks is an important of life in the United States as well. Some people who become poor by dropping out of school just got somewhat unlucky. There are stories of large success on people such as Mark Zuckerburg. What we do not here are the stories of people who attempted similar things and did not find success.
I believe that with good education a person could go anywhere they want to. If a person wants to be an engineer, all they have to do is go to school and learn it. I also think that people sometimes cut themselves short and ruin their lives because they make bad decisions. I think that if people could just work harder and make better choices there would be less people throughout the country under the poverty level.
Austin, you really summed this up nicely. I felt like your opinion was really clear. Your last paragraph also made me think of Ben Carson. I don't know if you did that on purpose but nice job!
Austin, it is a very interesting to say "that at some point someone made a mistake to be under the poverty level." I think you are right. Just as rich people work so their children can be born into a stable environment, some moderately wealthy people can make mistakes that lead them into poverty. Thus, it is their fault that their children are born impoverished. Their children will just have to work harder than those children born into riches.
I think your take on this situation is extremely interesting and something that I would not have thought of by myself. Nice job Austin!
The article was a very interesting twist on a current hot topic, poverty. To me, the idea of statistically lowering poverty by lowering the number of early pregnancy and single-parent families would be a very hard thing to do. Premarital sex has become a commonplace occurrence in today's society and is happening more frequently than it did in the 1970s. Reversing the number of teens engaging in the activity alone would almost be impossible let alone lowering the number of pregnancies that happen too.
Along with that comes the problem of single-parent families in the United States. In the article, Lowry says that single parent families make up 70% of the poverty level and says that "if single mothers were to marry the fathers of the children, about two-thirds of them would no longer be poor, in a stupendously effective anti-poverty program." I find that hard to believe, many couples do get married young and end up divorcing within a couple years. This can place the broken family into the poverty spectrum too not just not getting married in the first place. Which is better though not getting married and maybe being in poverty or being married, divorcing, and then possibly being in poverty? Where will the cycle end?
This problem of poverty will affect our generation the most because we will be the ones paying for it. Those who are in poverty will probably spend most of their lives there, unless they want to improve their situation, some won't. Where does this place the middle class? We will not only need to pay for our own families but for theirs too. Somehow someone needs to find an effective way to lower poverty or else it will drag us all down with it.
Erin, you did a great job of pointing out the flaws in his theories. I agree that the poverty rate is not something that can be controlled as easily as he wants to make it sound. Times are changing; this world will more than likely never be the way it was in 1970. You said it the best, "Where will the cycle end?" Marriage has a more significant reason than to merely improve the poverty rate. Young people often make mistakes, but marriage won't always be the answer. Just like you stated, divorces will just get them back to where they started. Nice blog, Erin!
Wow. Poverty seems to be one of those cautious issues to speak about. People watch their words and are, most if the time, afraid to offend. Rich Lowry is not one of those people. I was shocked at how blunt and straight forward he was, but I also give him props for doing so. He knew his opinion, he backed it up with facts and statistics, and clearly laid it out. He didn't beat around any bush, no sir. However, that doesn't mean I like him or agree with him.
I'm not sure that I do agree or disagree with him. I understand what he's saying, but I was a bit frustrated in the beginning when he said, "the essential formula for eluding poverty isn’t complicated: Graduate from high school, get a job, and get married before having children." Yes this is what most people, including me, plan to do with their lives, but things don't always go as planned. One mistake can ruin your entire future. I don't believe that there is one single solution for one single problem, I just don't agree with the "one size fits all" theory he is portraying.
There is a chance that you will graduate from highschool, a chance that you will get a job, a chance you will get married before having children. There is a chance you can do anything. Nothing is set in stone, and things are constantly changing. After all, the life we live now in the world is just one big game of chances. I say, do the best you can to better your chances at success.
Felicia, I really agree with your point of view and feel like we were saying the same thing. But I also think you did a better job of explaining your opinion than I did. I'm always impressed by how well you write, great job!
I absolutely love this article by Rich Lowry. He says in his article, “the essential formula for eluding poverty isn’t complicated: Graduate from high school, get a job, and get married before having children.” This is probably my favorite thing he said in his article. I relate it directly to Ben Carson. Carson was a man who made it out of the grits of poverty not by waiting for the next welfare check to come in the mail, but by working hard for all he was worth. Hard work, not hardly working, leads to success.
Lowry’s take on marriage is a bit controversial. One might argue that sometimes different things happen that lead to breakups in marriages and no one can really be blamed. Thus, the family should not be wrongfully condemned for their poverty. I think there is no arguing with that statement, sometimes things just happen. But what I think Lowry was trying to get across is that marriages should be taken seriously. A marriage impacts not only the life of you and your spouse, but also the life of your offspring.
For anyone, education is the key to success and the way to the top. There is nothing one cannot do with an education. Lowry says that “84 percent of those who go on to get a college degree will escape the bottom fifth, and 19 percent will make it all the way to the top fifth.” I think anyone, impoverished or not, could learn from those numbers. A college degree just gives you that extra step up on anyone in the workforce.
“Success ultimately depends on habits that money can’t buy.” This is probably the most meaningful statement Lowry says. I think he means that success is a mindset, a behavior. Anyone can be successful, from the poorest or the poor to the richest of the rich. Others may be born with better chances of being successful, but if one does not have the will or determination to work for success then they will not achieve it.
I would lastly agree with Lowry that the rich do not make it harder for anyone to achieve success. I would say some rich people were not just born into millions of dollars. They had to work for it. Thus, their hard work benefits their children and their children’s children. The rich do not hinder the poor; in fact in most cases they help the poor by donating money to various organizations. It is just as wrongful to blame the rich for being rich as it is to blame the poor for being poor. Both groups of people have the same opportunities in the beautiful American system of capitalism.
Ian, I agree that marriages should be taken very seriously. Not only does it affect them, but their children also. Nice point! I also loved your statement, "Hard work, not hardly working, leads to success." I think that point really set the tone for your entire blog. Your fourth paragraph was excellent. If you are lucky, you can be born into a rich family. However, success goes far beyond what money can buy. I also think that you summed everything up nicely in your concluding paragraph. Nice work!
While reading "The Great Equalizers," I had mixed feelings. Unless I misunderstood, I believe Rich Lowry was saying to not pity the poor. The rich are not to blame for the poverty rate. The rich went to school, got a job, and are living a good life. The poor either did not make anything out of their education, did not finish their high school education, or had children before even getting married and finding a good paying job.
I agree with many of his points, especially since my parents both went to college, got hired, and work hard each and every day. Why should they get punished for others who just sit around all day? However, I do not like how he stereotyped all poor people. Yes, most people who are poor do not work to their full potential in order to make a better life for themselves and their families. However, some were never given the opportunity. It all depends on the situation. Unless you personally know each person, you cannot assume anything. There may be more to the story of why the family is poor. For example, one member may have serious medical issues. The parents may be working a few jobs and still struggling to get by.
On that same note, I think that my generation should work towards improving the poverty rate. We should encourage one another to make the most out of our educations instead of relying on unemployment. As Rich Lowry states, "The rich aren't causing anyone to have children out of wedlock, or drop out of high school, or stop looking for a job." However, are we encouraging them to make better decisions? As far as my family goes, we are not rich nor are we poor. We are a happy medium! In order for our nation to get back on its feet, everyone must work together to help those less fortunate than us and support those who could be at the same level as us.
Sam, I really liked how you pointed out that not all poor repose are in the same situation. We should not stereotype all poor people as being lazy, but honestly many are. I enjoyed reading your opinion, good job!
While reading this article I started to get angry about the lack of work ethic in the United States. I understand that there will be points in every family's life where the budget is tight. I believe that is is completely normal to want to spend money on nice things or not be a completely responsible adult all of the time. These things are fine in moderation, just like everything else in life.
I completely agree with the point that Rich Lowry made in saying that poverty can be avoided for the most part with hard work. If families are educated, motivated, and smart about financial decisions then more than likely they will be able to avoid poverty. But many times I believe that problem is cause by not being smart with money and careful where you spend it. Many people who spend their money frivolously, we're not taught how to properly manage their budget and be smart with the money they have. Also everyone should have to be able to live on their own and comfortable support themselves before starting a family. If you are able to each provide for your self it should only take minor adjustments to be able to successfully support a family.
Instead of using common sense to lead them in their life, people often blow their money and expect welfare and financial assistance to aid them as a crutch. And to be completely honest as long as they have these things, there is no motivation for them to work and spend the money they they have wisely. America is enabling those who simply don't want to work hard to get what they want. In result the work ethic in America is lowering and laziness rising.
While I was reading the article, I found myself growing very angry. I realized, once I was done reading, that I was not frustrated with Rich Lowry for giving the speech but with the people of which he was talking. Being poor is not always something that can be controlled, however, there are times when poverty can be avoided.
ReplyDeleteWhile reading the article again I had a flashback of the seminar we had today in class. I went over the parts when we were discussing how a college education can increase the likeness of a good job after getting a college degree. I also recalled though, that one doesn't need an education to go far in life if they simply try their hardest and are open to learning and bettering themselves.
I found the article very realistic. Many people are becoming pregnant out of wedlock. Even someone does not have children, they do not work to their full potential meaning they are not doing their best work. If they would try harder and do their best, they would be more likely to become noticed and be offered a promotion, therefore increasing their income.
Americans are becoming less and less willing to do the work that their parents did before them. They realize that they can receive unemployment or just get by with doing the bare minimum. This is the problem. If Americans actually put forth 100% of effort into whatever they were doing, the poverty level would drop and this county would become a much better place. Rich Lowry said it best "they don’t make it harder for anyone else to get ahead." It's up to each and every one of us to change the world. I will leave you with a saying of inspiration: be the change you wish to see in the world.
Jess, I loved your blog. It related to a lot that was talked about in both the article and in out discussions. This morning I was talking with Ann and Natalie, and we remarked on the current rivalry between countries, in which America is falling behind. My mother told me recently about the type of schooling in Japan, and it sounded dreadful to me, focusing their entire lives on nothing but schoolwork. But maybe America needs more of that. Kids need to stop being fed the idea that sports are more important than education, when their education is what will take them farther in life. I got a little longwinded there, but your blog sparked some ideas. Keep up the good work!
DeleteJess, you did a great job on this blog. I especially liked your last comment. You and I definitely have coinciding opinions about this issue. I agree that our generation needs to realize that our work ethic is nowhere near that of our ancestors, and we jus work to improve. Great job!
DeleteJessica, I agree with a lot of your blog! I enjoyed your opening and second paragraph because I too think that much of poverty could be avoided depending on the different people and their situation. Good work!
DeleteFor ages, America has been known as the land of opportunities. People from all over the world immigrate to America for the chance to make a living, to thrive in a world of their making. America has become a culturally diverse country where hard work can take you anywhere. It is a country that revolves around the idea of capitalism; business is lead by individuals or companies instead of the government. As such, individuals need to work hard if they want to succeed, yet some people do not seem to understand this.
ReplyDelete"The Great Equalizers" by Rich Lowry was filled with different thoughts and ideas, but it centers around the belief, or disbelief in his case, that the inequality crisis in America is due to the rich. Frankly, I find the thought insulting and completely agree with Lowry. I don't really think of my family as being rich, but we are pretty well off. That is because my parents studied hard in school and continue to work hard daily. They have difficult jobs that required a proper education, and so they have reaped what they sowed. I do not think that these luxuries that they enjoy are in anyway unfair, though maybe I am slightly biased as someone who benefits from their toils.
In a more personal way I find it undermining. Recently I listened in on a conversation my mom had with my stepdad. They discussed how taxes for those who a higher income are higher than those with a lower income, and the reason why they find it unfair. They work hard, put in extra time, and do their jobs. They are rewarded for their above-average work with the loss of their hard-earned money. If your going to end up losing so much money, why not do any easier job in the first place? Maybe that is not the right way to view it, but it is discouraging. Why should I struggle if it will not make my life any better? That is the message I feel I have been sent.
This same message has been sent to the rest of our generation, but a time will come when we see the results. Will our generation fall apart and lose all motivation to excel? Or will we toss these preconceived notions aside and live our lives to the fullest? Only time will tell, as the saying goes. I believe that young adults will not be influenced by this. Certainly a few will, but there will always be those who simply breeze through life doing nothing more than the bare-minimum. And maybe I speak more of myself than the generation as a whole, but I think that we are a pretty competitive bunch, whether with others or simply ourselves. We will continue to learn and to moil throughout our lives, despite the income that we make.
Meaghan, your last paragraph summed up your blog very nicely. I have to agree that there will always be those who simply breeze through life only doing what they absolutely have to, which when you really think about it, is quite sad. Around St. Marys, people are just very competitive. Everyone tries their hardest because they want to reach their goal whether it's winning a game, medal, or just doing something they've never done before. Going into your blog more, I think that as much as it is the individual's responsibility to have the motivation and drive to excel in life, the parents and generation above that person need to be encouraging and willing to teach the skills that are needed. Looks like I got long winded too. Good blog Megs!
DeleteThe article "The Great Equalizers", written by Rich Lowry was one that I found kind of startling. As I was reading the article, I found that I felt bad for the poverish people they were referring too.
ReplyDeleteFor one thing, they can't always control that they are living pay check to pay check. When the article stated, "if all Americans finished high school, worked full time at whatever job they then qualified for with their education, and married at the same rate as Americans had married in 1970, the poverty rate would be cut by around 70 percent," this made me quite angry. This statement was unsettling to me mostly because most of the time, it is not there choice to not finish high school or marry someone. I am sure if you asked any of those people they would definitely want to finish their high school and/or college career if they had the opportunity to.
The article also seemed to imply that the high amount of poverty isn't caused by the overwhelming amount of people on the other end of things. However, I think it does. As one can see, there is an imbalance between the low, middle, and high class of people. There needs to be more of a balance, because I think that would cut down on the amount of poverty overall.
As far as my family goes, I am not sure exactly where we stand in the midst of this. But, I do know that both of my parents have good, solid jobs. We also have a nice house, food in the fridge, new clothes on our backs, and my brothers and I receive a quality Catholic education. I know I can't complain.
Tori, while I agree that a better balance would be good for our economy, I disagree that it isn't a person's choice to finish their degree or get married when they have a child out of wedlock. Any person can get a GED and many people who don't finish were expelled or dropped out. And while they might express a wish to have gotten a higher education, the real question is, would they if given the chance? You did a great job on this blog Tori, and it was nice to hear your opinion although we disagree.
DeleteTori, I really like how you approached the issue of poverty from a different angle. I never thought about it as being imbalanced, but now that I read what you wrote, I could not agree more. I really enjoy how you talked about your family and how even though you don't know where you stand in the characteristics of poverty, you don't plan on letting that stop you from doing your best with everything you do. Good job!
DeleteTori, it was interesting to read your blog. We have very different opinions, so I was curious to see where your blog would go. While I did not agree with what you said, you made very valid points. Good work!
DeleteTori, I agree with Meaghan. I did not completely agree with everything you said about the poverty people, but I enjoyed your blog. Poverty is such a difficult topic to discuss and I thought you stated your opinions very well. Good job!
DeleteTori, we share the same opinion concerning poverty. I liked that you quoted the article to support your points. Great job!
DeleteTori, I feel very similar to the way you described in your last sentence. I also like how you used quotes and good descriptions in your blog. Well done!
DeleteWhen I read the article “The Great Equalizer”, I thought that some of the points Rich Lowry made were rather intriguing. He stated that rich people have absolutely nothing to do with the “inequality crisis”. No I don’t know that I totally agree with that statement, but I don’t totally disagree with it either. There are times when poverty seems unavoidable. Many poor people state that they don’t really have an option. In some situations this is true, but in others poverty is rather simple to avoid.
ReplyDeleteMost people who are rich took a chance during their lifetime. They did something that was risky, but if it paid off they would be in a great situation financially. This chance could have been taken by anyone, whether they are poor, middle class, or rich. People may not all have the same opportunities, but everyone has opportunities in life to make something out of themselves. It is the people who truly want to go somewhere in life that take advantage of those opportunities. I don’t think that I blame the “inequality crisis” on a certain group of people. Each group of people could probably be doing something more than they are now.
It would be beneficial for the country if they figured out a way to balance the situation between the poor, middle class, and rich. This is a great example why a good education is necessary. If a person receives a good education and uses it the correct way, they will be doing well. Dr. Ben Carson grew up in a rough situation. His family did not have much money at all, but he received an education. He then went to college, and he only had more success from that point on.
I definitely would not call my family rich or poor. We are right in the middle. I can’t complain at all about my living situation. I receive an education at a Catholic school, and I live in a nice house. I know that these things and many more activities that I take part in are mostly because my parents are able to bring in a good income. This is because they both work hard and long hours each week. It is essential that if a person wants to be successful in the world today they must work hard.
Drew, what really hit me from your blog was how you didn't fully blame either side, meaning the rich or the poor, you simply offered solutions to the problem instead of picking a side. I found that rather interesting and think that it was a very unique angle to approach from. Excellent work!
DeleteWow, Drew. I loved how you didn't pick a side and you viewed each side, rich and poor, separately. Interesting take! Good job.
DeleteDrew, I too believe that the government should try and find a solution on how to create a balance between the poor, middle, and rich class. Also, I think it was important that you brought up that the most successful and/or wealthy people took a chance during their life. You will never know if you can be successful unless you risk it and try.
DeleteGreat Job!
I neither agree nor disagree with the opinion that Rich Lowry expressed on poverty in his article 'The Great Equalizers.' But how could I be expected to when he wrote about such a controversial topic? A lot of people are trying to play the blame game with poverty; who's at fault for the increase? I think that Rich Lowry makes his opinion obvious in his final line, "In other words, they don’t cut anyone off from the foundations of success that are the country’s great equalizers." The 'they' that he refers to are the people who are financial stable, and what he's saying is that they are not responsible for others failure. But is that true?
ReplyDeleteI see poverty as being no different than any other topic, there are two sides to the story. In some cases, I agree with Lowry because the people who end up without money brought it upon themselves. On the other hand, when someone is laid off and they are unable to find a job, can they help it? It's the same way with everything. I don't make a solid opinion because I understand that each situation is different.
Rich Lowry's article was harsh, but I found it likable. Even though I didn't agree with everything he said, his honest and straight-forward opinion is refreshing. People beat around the bush to much these days (excuse the cliche.) He also backed himself up with impressive statistic and a sort of rude pathos where he called out the people who were just making bad choices and being lazy. It was persuasive, but I still don't think that anyone is responsible for poverty.
Ann, your approach to this blog was unique, and I enjoyed reading it. I thought it was nice that you gave an honest opinion about not being able to give a solid opinion. Great job!
DeleteAnn, I agree with your point of view, each situation is unique and you can't make assumptions about people's lives. Poverty is a topic that can have many different sides and you can't have one inclusive opinion on it. Good job
DeleteI completely agree with your last paragraph, Ann! He was harsh, but stil you have to admire how bold he was. Another great post!
Delete"The Great Equalizers" by Rich Lowry made me quite angry. I disagree with a lot of what he had to say, but I do see where he is coming from.
ReplyDeleteI believe that the rich do have a lot of control over the jobs and education of poor people, but not all of it. Who hires, or mostly doesn't hire, these people in poverty? That's right, the middle or high classes. Without a job, how can they be able to afford an education beyond high school? If college courses weren't so expensive, this might not be as big of a problem. I also believe that the many low class people are stereotyped into their lifestyles. Yes, they should be trying to prove those stereotypes wrong, but that can be difficult when the people around them don't have faith in them. The people who are stuck in poverty have the power to change the way they are living. They can go out and apply for job after job until one of them is the right one for them. It's a controversial topic, but I think that poverty is the result of a lack of unity and openness in this country.
I would consider my family middle class. My parents make a living that keeps a roof over our heads and food on the table, and that's enough for me. For this generation, I truly think anything is possible. I've been surprised with the accomplishments the people around have made. Their hard work and dedication makes it easier to have faith.
I believe that anyone, no matter their race, religion, education level, or financial standards, can accomplish anything. If you want to be a neurosurgeon like Ben Carson, then work hard, put forth all of your effort, believe in yourself. I don't think your social class should determine your abilities in life, but, in most cases, they do. Education is important, but it's not everything. I think the most important thing in life is how you perceive yourself and go about the options you make for yourself.
Natalie, I really like the way that you thought about both sides of the poverty controversy. They may not have too many options, but it is crucial that they try to prove other people wrong who stereotype them. Life is not fair! You did a great job at relating the topic to Ben Carson. Anyone can accomplish anything in life if they put in the hard work and dedication. Good effort!
DeleteNatalie, your view is interesting. I agree with you that people should be able to change their circumstance and many try, some succeed and others don't. It is up to the middle and higher classes to give them opportunities to through jobs but it is up to them to perform well to keep their jobs. Overall, nice job.
DeleteNatalie, I like your strong view on this situation, but there are a few things I would disagree with. I would agree that middle or higher classes do most of the hiring but I do not think it gives them control over who is poor and who is not. Those hiring have one job, hire the most qualified, capable applicant. I do no think they are worried about who is poor or who is rich. If they were then they would be discriminating against others, thus not doing their job correctly. I would also like to argue that an education beyond high school is not impossible for the impoverished. If you are smart and you get all the right scores and all the right grades, you will be noticed. Someone is going to help you get into college. There are also scholarships that people can earn so they do not have to fully pay the steep college prices. I guess the bottom line is if you are smart you are going to be noticed for your actions. I would further argue that those with a high school degree can still be successful. My dad never went on to college, but he owned PA Body and Frame for over twenty years. I am also sure that there are more people who went on to be successful with only a high school degree.
DeleteI highly respect your stance and opinion on the matter, I just differ my thinking a little bit.
Nice job Natalie!
Poverty in America has become a huge issue. Our country is slowly losing the work ethic it began with and allowing for the government to provide enough assistance for a family to live on without working. Before I am contradicted for stereotyping, allow me to say, not all of the poor are like this. Many have good work ethics and simply struggle to find a good steady job or encounter other difficulties that are uncontrollable. These are not the people I speak of. The article "The Great Equalizers" does a good job characterizing them. Single parents who refuse to marry the father or mother of their child, people who do not graduate from high school, and those who don't work more than sixteen hours a week are the ones I speak of.
ReplyDeleteIt's come to the point where people need to accept their station in life. I don't mean that if there is a possibility to improve, it shouldn't be taken. Our county needs workers who are willing to do menial labor. But, many people now believe that no matter their station in life, they shouldn't have to do that kind of work. They won't accept that someone needs to do this work, and that someone might be them. Without a high school degree, there are very few jobs that can be found that aren't menial labor. And, as the article stated, employers are looking for reliable, honest, and hard-working individuals. Without these characteristics, or lacking the drive to develop them, many of the impoverished are unable to hold good jobs because of their poor character.
My father is an extraordinary man. He completed his high school degree, but never continued his education to care for his mother. He began working when he was 14, and never stopped. He took whatever work he could, starting at a factory and was one of their best workers for the many years he worked there. He might not have liked it, but he knew he had to do it. He eventually went to work at the sewage plant where he has been promoted to the second highest position available. Despite his lack of a formal education, he opened his own small mechanic garage from his house. He worked on people's cars, fixing, painting, and even being commissioned to build cars from scrap. He is the deputy chief of the local fire department and an EMT, and somehow found time to rebuild our house. He has done so much, and yet could have easily have turned out to be poor instead of bringing himself and our family to the middle class. The one thing that determined this was his work ethic. He never stops and is so passionate about everything he does. He worked a full year with a herniation in his spine that should have greatly limited his mobility.
I will never believe that a person cannot change their own lives and station in life. If a person is determined and willing to take some risks, they can always continually improve although it might be slow going. Tenacity is something that has begun to fade in our country. Our generation is losing that will to fight to achieve something. I also partly blame the media and what it teaches now. Instead of dreading teen pregnancy, TV has begun to glorify it which causes girls to believe that they will be fine if that happens. But, the girls shown are being paid money that they can use to support themselves, while most other girls will have to be with their child and work a full time job to get by. That job, since they became impregnated in high school and probably just got a GED, will most likely not be a glamorous one.
Poverty is not caused because the rich are taking opportunities away from the poor. It's because the poor won't go find jobs and then strive to keep them. America needs to start encouraging better work ethics. More investigation should determine how much financial aid should be given to people, and should be lessened if possible. Poverty is a hard thing to fight, but it's time America went about it the right way.
Hannah, when you talk about the things your father did without a high education it was very astonishing to me. Most of the people in my family had to go to college before they could begin their jobs. It was very interesting and helpful to read your take on education. Really goos work!
DeleteHan, I really loved how you used your dad as an example of how hard work can get you very far in life. I completely agree that if someone wants to change their situation that can. You had very powerful points, Great Job!!
DeleteHannah, I think it is quite a success story when you talk about all that you father has accomplished. He reminds me of Ben Carson when you stated how me might now have liked that particular job, but he made the best of it and was the best worker the company had. Ben Carson always made sure whatever job he had that he was the very best at it.
DeleteHowever, I do feel in today's society, a high school and college education is needed to go somewhere. It is unfortunate that kids today cannot make a life out of what your father did.
The article, "The Great Equalizers", by Rich Lowry was very interesting as it discussed the poverty issue. The statistics and facts about the topics of marriage, working, children, and education were quite fascinating. I personally agreed with some thing Rich Lowry said and disagreed with others, but I still felt it was a very good article,
ReplyDeleteThe first topic was marriage and children. I do agree that having two parents makes a family stronger and decreases the chance for poverty. The family has two people employed or working with the house rather than one. However, sometimes situations occur where there isn't a father or mother involved, and I do not think that those people should be blamed and criticized for their poverty. I am blessed with two working and educated parents, but sometimes it is not that simple.
The next main issue is that of education. The number of dropouts is increasing and it is scary sometimes. My brother's friend just dropped out of college and it was sad to hear but real. The percentages given by Rich Lowry are crazy. This generation has so many people that seem to be just giving up on their education either in high school or college. It is a stressful life, but I think the students need to be pushed harder and realize how important having an education can be. Not only for the job sake, but also for the pride and dignity.
Jobs however are also very important. So many people are not striving for a good job. I do think more adults should be pressured to work more full time jobs, but I also feel that sometimes it is difficult. Yes, no job means no income. This is a major reason for poverty within families. My family stresses the importance of having a successful job. Both of my parents are successfully working. I am truly thankful for all my parents do to put a roof over my head and food on the table.
All in all, I do not disagree with most of what Rich Lowry had to say. I think he stresses the importances of what the people are doing that is causing such an increase in poverty. If people would work harder and strive to be the best they can, poverty would not be as much of an issue that it is.
Jolene, I like how you explain that when a father or mother is not involved in a marriage anymore, the other people in the family should not be criticized. I also enjoy how you talk about how critical it is to find a good job in the world today. It is rather challenging to be successful without a good career that you enjoy. Great work!
Delete"The Great Equalizer" made some statements that I found very true. I discovered myself really believing in what was said. Not that every time someone is below the poverty level it is their fault, but more often than not I believe that it is the person under the person who is poor's fault. At some point some one in the person's family had to make a mistake to be under the poverty level. I also believe that people can get stuck under the poverty level. When parents make mistakes like not being educated or having children out of wedlock it creates circumstances that are extremely difficult to get out of. Many people have to overcome odds because they start out in poor conditions to start their lives but do make it out.
ReplyDeleteI believe that taking risks is an important of life in the United States as well. Some people who become poor by dropping out of school just got somewhat unlucky. There are stories of large success on people such as Mark Zuckerburg. What we do not here are the stories of people who attempted similar things and did not find success.
I believe that with good education a person could go anywhere they want to. If a person wants to be an engineer, all they have to do is go to school and learn it. I also think that people sometimes cut themselves short and ruin their lives because they make bad decisions. I think that if people could just work harder and make better choices there would be less people throughout the country under the poverty level.
Austin, you really summed this up nicely. I felt like your opinion was really clear. Your last paragraph also made me think of Ben Carson. I don't know if you did that on purpose but nice job!
DeleteAustin, it is a very interesting to say "that at some point someone made a mistake to be under the poverty level." I think you are right. Just as rich people work so their children can be born into a stable environment, some moderately wealthy people can make mistakes that lead them into poverty. Thus, it is their fault that their children are born impoverished. Their children will just have to work harder than those children born into riches.
DeleteI think your take on this situation is extremely interesting and something that I would not have thought of by myself. Nice job Austin!
The article was a very interesting twist on a current hot topic, poverty. To me, the idea of statistically lowering poverty by lowering the number of early pregnancy and single-parent families would be a very hard thing to do. Premarital sex has become a commonplace occurrence in today's society and is happening more frequently than it did in the 1970s. Reversing the number of teens engaging in the activity alone would almost be impossible let alone lowering the number of pregnancies that happen too.
ReplyDeleteAlong with that comes the problem of single-parent families in the United States. In the article, Lowry says that single parent families make up 70% of the poverty level and says that "if single mothers were to marry the fathers of the children, about two-thirds of them would no longer be poor, in a stupendously effective anti-poverty program." I find that hard to believe, many couples do get married young and end up divorcing within a couple years. This can place the broken family into the poverty spectrum too not just not getting married in the first place. Which is better though not getting married and maybe being in poverty or being married, divorcing, and then possibly being in poverty? Where will the cycle end?
This problem of poverty will affect our generation the most because we will be the ones paying for it. Those who are in poverty will probably spend most of their lives there, unless they want to improve their situation, some won't. Where does this place the middle class? We will not only need to pay for our own families but for theirs too. Somehow someone needs to find an effective way to lower poverty or else it will drag us all down with it.
Erin, you did a great job of pointing out the flaws in his theories. I agree that the poverty rate is not something that can be controlled as easily as he wants to make it sound. Times are changing; this world will more than likely never be the way it was in 1970. You said it the best, "Where will the cycle end?" Marriage has a more significant reason than to merely improve the poverty rate. Young people often make mistakes, but marriage won't always be the answer. Just like you stated, divorces will just get them back to where they started. Nice blog, Erin!
DeleteWow. Poverty seems to be one of those cautious issues to speak about. People watch their words and are, most if the time, afraid to offend. Rich Lowry is not one of those people. I was shocked at how blunt and straight forward he was, but I also give him props for doing so. He knew his opinion, he backed it up with facts and statistics, and clearly laid it out. He didn't beat around any bush, no sir. However, that doesn't mean I like him or agree with him.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure that I do agree or disagree with him. I understand what he's saying, but I was a bit frustrated in the beginning when he said, "the essential formula for eluding poverty isn’t complicated: Graduate from high school, get a job, and get married before having children." Yes this is what most people, including me, plan to do with their lives, but things don't always go as planned. One mistake can ruin your entire future. I don't believe that there is one single solution for one single problem, I just don't agree with the "one size fits all" theory he is portraying.
There is a chance that you will graduate from highschool, a chance that you will get a job, a chance you will get married before having children. There is a chance you can do anything. Nothing is set in stone, and things are constantly changing. After all, the life we live now in the world is just one big game of chances. I say, do the best you can to better your chances at success.
Felicia, I really agree with your point of view and feel like we were saying the same thing. But I also think you did a better job of explaining your opinion than I did. I'm always impressed by how well you write, great job!
DeleteI absolutely love this article by Rich Lowry. He says in his article, “the essential formula for eluding poverty isn’t complicated: Graduate from high school, get a job, and get married before having children.” This is probably my favorite thing he said in his article. I relate it directly to Ben Carson. Carson was a man who made it out of the grits of poverty not by waiting for the next welfare check to come in the mail, but by working hard for all he was worth. Hard work, not hardly working, leads to success.
ReplyDeleteLowry’s take on marriage is a bit controversial. One might argue that sometimes different things happen that lead to breakups in marriages and no one can really be blamed. Thus, the family should not be wrongfully condemned for their poverty. I think there is no arguing with that statement, sometimes things just happen. But what I think Lowry was trying to get across is that marriages should be taken seriously. A marriage impacts not only the life of you and your spouse, but also the life of your offspring.
For anyone, education is the key to success and the way to the top. There is nothing one cannot do with an education. Lowry says that “84 percent of those who go on to get a college degree will escape the bottom fifth, and 19 percent will make it all the way to the top fifth.” I think anyone, impoverished or not, could learn from those numbers. A college degree just gives you that extra step up on anyone in the workforce.
“Success ultimately depends on habits that money can’t buy.” This is probably the most meaningful statement Lowry says. I think he means that success is a mindset, a behavior. Anyone can be successful, from the poorest or the poor to the richest of the rich. Others may be born with better chances of being successful, but if one does not have the will or determination to work for success then they will not achieve it.
I would lastly agree with Lowry that the rich do not make it harder for anyone to achieve success. I would say some rich people were not just born into millions of dollars. They had to work for it. Thus, their hard work benefits their children and their children’s children. The rich do not hinder the poor; in fact in most cases they help the poor by donating money to various organizations. It is just as wrongful to blame the rich for being rich as it is to blame the poor for being poor. Both groups of people have the same opportunities in the beautiful American system of capitalism.
Ian, I agree that marriages should be taken very seriously. Not only does it affect them, but their children also. Nice point! I also loved your statement, "Hard work, not hardly working, leads to success." I think that point really set the tone for your entire blog. Your fourth paragraph was excellent. If you are lucky, you can be born into a rich family. However, success goes far beyond what money can buy. I also think that you summed everything up nicely in your concluding paragraph. Nice work!
DeleteWhile reading "The Great Equalizers," I had mixed feelings. Unless I misunderstood, I believe Rich Lowry was saying to not pity the poor. The rich are not to blame for the poverty rate. The rich went to school, got a job, and are living a good life. The poor either did not make anything out of their education, did not finish their high school education, or had children before even getting married and finding a good paying job.
ReplyDeleteI agree with many of his points, especially since my parents both went to college, got hired, and work hard each and every day. Why should they get punished for others who just sit around all day? However, I do not like how he stereotyped all poor people. Yes, most people who are poor do not work to their full potential in order to make a better life for themselves and their families. However, some were never given the opportunity. It all depends on the situation. Unless you personally know each person, you cannot assume anything. There may be more to the story of why the family is poor. For example, one member may have serious medical issues. The parents may be working a few jobs and still struggling to get by.
On that same note, I think that my generation should work towards improving the poverty rate. We should encourage one another to make the most out of our educations instead of relying on unemployment. As Rich Lowry states, "The rich aren't causing anyone to have children out of wedlock, or drop out of high school, or stop looking for a job." However, are we encouraging them to make better decisions? As far as my family goes, we are not rich nor are we poor. We are a happy medium! In order for our nation to get back on its feet, everyone must work together to help those less fortunate than us and support those who could be at the same level as us.
Sam, I really liked how you pointed out that not all poor repose are in the same situation. We should not stereotype all poor people as being lazy, but honestly many are. I enjoyed reading your opinion, good job!
DeleteWhile reading this article I started to get angry about the lack of work ethic in the United States. I understand that there will be points in every family's life where the budget is tight. I believe that is is completely normal to want to spend money on nice things or not be a completely responsible adult all of the time. These things are fine in moderation, just like everything else in life.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with the point that Rich Lowry made in saying that poverty can be avoided for the most part with hard work. If families are educated, motivated, and smart about financial decisions then more than likely they will be able to avoid poverty. But many times I believe that problem is cause by not being smart with money and careful where you spend it. Many people who spend their money frivolously, we're not taught how to properly manage their budget and be smart with the money they have. Also everyone should have to be able to live on their own and comfortable support themselves before starting a family. If you are able to each provide for your self it should only take minor adjustments to be able to successfully support a family.
Instead of using common sense to lead them in their life, people often blow their money and expect welfare and financial assistance to aid them as a crutch. And to be completely honest as long as they have these things, there is no motivation for them to work and spend the money they they have wisely. America is enabling those who simply don't want to work hard to get what they want. In result the work ethic in America is lowering and laziness rising.